One McAvennieeeeee
7:26 Sun Nov 1
Re: Watford v West Ham - Official Match Thread FT 2-0
|
I've spoken about the match. A couple of times.
I haven't avoided anything.
|
Rodfarts
7:24 Sun Nov 1
Re: Watford v West Ham - Official Match Thread FT 2-0
|
Glad you avoided the point.
Says alot.
Cheers
|
One McAvennieeeeee
7:12 Sun Nov 1
Re: Watford v West Ham - Official Match Thread FT 2-0
|
So I never said possession is irrelevant then?
Cheers.
|
Rodfarts
7:11 Sun Nov 1
Re: Watford v West Ham - Official Match Thread FT 2-0
|
You're using the stat as a gage to if we were outplayed.......suggesting we wasn't because the stat was 50/50?
We were outplayed......stats don't always tell the game we know that from previous.
Outplayed and well beaten whether mistakes led to goals or not we deserved to lose.
Am I panicking about it? No let's see what happens against the toffees.
|
Romfordboy
7:08 Sun Nov 1
Re: Watford v West Ham - Official Match Thread FT 2-0
|
I think song should make a difference against the smaller teams
|
One McAvennieeeeee
7:05 Sun Nov 1
Re: Watford v West Ham - Official Match Thread FT 2-0
|
When did I say it was irrelevant?
|
Rodfarts
7:03 Sun Nov 1
Re: Watford v West Ham - Official Match Thread FT 2-0
|
So is possesion important now Macca? ?
I thought it was irrelevant when we played arsenal man city etc.
|
nerd
6:11 Sun Nov 1
Re: Watford v West Ham - Official Match Thread FT 2-0
|
We were shit, but actually should've come away with at least a fluke point. We've committed more errors for goals than any other team this season by some way and it's always against the lesser teams. If billic can sort this out, we will start winning these games, getting points when playing badly is the mark of a good team,man utd were experts at it and still are to an extent. We are not far off, just need to stop the stupid needless errors.
|
One McAvennieeeeee
5:42 Sun Nov 1
Re: Watford v West Ham - Official Match Thread FT 2-0
|
Cheers tex. I hadn't looked but the feeling I got there is summed up by those stats.
Possession was even. The timing of goals was very key. I reckon most of their attempts were after the second when we had loads of offensive players on and pushing to get back into the game.
They deserved the win but some of the stuff on here is proper dramatic though. We can't win every game.
|
Texas Iron
5:42 Sun Nov 1
Re: Watford v West Ham - Official Match Thread FT 2-0
|
NSD...
my stats are correct...yours not...sadly...
|
NEVER SAY DIE
5:40 Sun Nov 1
Re: Watford v West Ham - Official Match Thread FT 2-0
|
Possession isn't that relevant tbh it's what you do with it that matters.
Watford had 25 shots in the game, we had 11.
They where a constant threat and we had very little threat whatsoever. I'd call that a dominant win.
We couldn't match them at all anywhere on the pitch. The back 4 where constantly abused by Ighalo and Deeney. The midfield was woefully inept both at protecting the back 4 and creating anything for Carroll or the wide players plus the front 3 where totally toothless and in Watford's back pocket all game.
The positive is that we now have a Manager who seen that and will fix it.
|
Texas Iron
5:39 Sun Nov 1
Re: Watford v West Ham - Official Match Thread FT 2-0
|
Possession...50-50...
Watford 20 attempts...5 on target...We had 8...3 on target...
|
Staffs-Hammer
5:37 Sun Nov 1
Re: Watford v West Ham - Official Match Thread FT 2 -0
|
Interesting about Tomkins, there was a thread on here about him earlier on in the week and I said that I've never been 100% convinced by him and other's were saying similar.
Competition for places can only be a good thing though in terms of making all the centre backs up their game.
|
Texas Iron
5:37 Sun Nov 1
Re: Watford v West Ham - Official Match Thread FT 2-0
|
One McAvennieeeeee 5:28 Sun Nov 1
Agreed...however we were below par up front and in MF for most of the game...
As Bilic said... low energy and .not our usual intensity...
Everton on today's form will be a strong test of our defence...Errors will kill us again...
.
|
One McAvennieeeeee
5:33 Sun Nov 1
Re: Watford v West Ham - Official Match Thread FT 2-0
|
They did deserve to win. Where did I say they didn't.
What were the possession stats? For them to out play us I would expect them to be 65 35 in their favour. If they were then fair enough. It didn't seem like that to me though.
They scored the killer second early in the second half. We pushed forward and they created a number of chances on the break. That's how football generally plays out in those circumstances.
|
NEVER SAY DIE
5:30 Sun Nov 1
Re: Watford v West Ham - Official Match Thread FT 2-0
|
One McAvennieeeeee 5:28 Sun Nov 1
Noble certainly wasn't to blame for the defeat but it's a bit naive stating that Watford didn't outplay us. Even our own Manager stated they deserved the win and where the better team despite our own errors.
We weren't good enough
It was unacceptable
His words not mine.
|
One McAvennieeeeee
5:28 Sun Nov 1
Re: Watford v West Ham - Official Match Thread FT 2-0
|
Can't be bothered son. It's ridiculous.
You blame him for every defeat. I think it's funny to be honest.
We lost because Carroll and tomkins made errors that directly lead to Watfords 2 goals. They didnt out play us and didn't out battle us. We were throwing the kitchen sink at them and they played on the break.
We can't win every game.
|
Romfordboy
5:27 Sun Nov 1
Re: Watford v West Ham - Official Match Thread FT 2-0
|
Nobes wasn't at fault but defo is a weak link... As he is being subbed most games I reckon bilic can see it as well
Don't think song is going to ready for atleast a month though probably closer to xmas
|
Rodfarts
5:26 Sun Nov 1
Re: Watford v West Ham - Official Match Thread FT 2-0
|
I'm open for anyone to rip my previous post apart Macca son.
|
One McAvennieeeeee
5:23 Sun Nov 1
Re: Watford v West Ham - Official Match Thread FT 2-0
|
So Carroll and tomkins make 2 ridiculous embarrassing errors and it's Nobles fault?
You're losing your touch, rodders son. You need to mix it up a bit more.
|
Staffs-Hammer
5:09 Sun Nov 1
Re: Watford v West Ham - Official Match Thread FT 2-0
|
mallard 4:34 Sun Nov 1
|
| 
